Advises the Group CEO on live M&A decisions.
Assesses business value, the sustainability of earnings and financial risks, with analysis the board can trace to its sources.
I turn financial records and deal questions into analysis leaders can challenge, with assumptions and source links kept visible.
A potential acquisition needs more than a headline valuation. Leaders need to understand sustainable earnings, financial risks and the evidence behind the assumptions.
I build the financial analysis and prepare the decision pack. It connects valuation, sustainable earnings, currency translation and financial risks to their supporting evidence.
Used the approach in live transaction work. One engagement led to an acquisition recommendation and integration plan. No completed transaction outcome is disclosed.
An invented business and figures illustrate how a decision report can work. This demonstration is not evidence of a delivered deal or a real transaction outcome.
Follow the financial investigation, trace the reasoning, then explore the related reporting factory.
Select a layer or play the walkthrough.
Follow the highlighted route through each layer. Select any box to explore its other connections.
A clear question sets the scope. Source review and financial analysis lead to a recommendation that leadership can challenge.
This is the public method, not a record of a disclosed transaction. Preparing a recommendation does not establish that a deal closed.
The full view includes search, connected paths, presentation mode and export tools.
Choose a part to see its purpose, its connections and supporting detail.
I frame the valuation, earnings and financial-risk questions the analysis needs to answer. The scope depends on the opportunity.
I review the available financial records and use initial AI-assisted document extraction where useful. Source links make the extracted figures available for checking.
I assess sustainable earnings, valuation assumptions and financial risks. Transaction-specific judgement remains visible within a consistent method.
I bring the analysis together in a decision pack, stating the recommendation, its assumptions and what still needs to be resolved.
Leadership can question the evidence and assumptions behind the recommendation. The acquisition decision remains with leadership.
The analysis can inform an integration plan and further diligence. A plan is distinct from a completed acquisition or an executed integration.
Unresolved questions return to investigation. The pack should make the uncertainty visible rather than present an unsupported conclusion.
Figures, assumptions and judgement travel through different checks before they meet in the decision pack.
The view explains the method. It contains no private figures, transaction assumptions or client records; a scenario remains an assumption, not an observed result.
The full view includes search, connected paths, presentation mode and export tools.
Choose a part to see its purpose, its connections and supporting detail.
Financial statements and supporting deal records provide the basis for the analysis. I preserve source links so a reviewer can inspect where a figure came from.
Extracted figures remain subject to deterministic checks. An AI extraction is an initial aid, not an independently accepted financial fact.
The checked figures support quality-of-earnings and valuation work, including currency translation where relevant. The analysis keeps transaction-specific treatment explicit.
I distinguish findings supported by the records from assumptions and unresolved questions. Conclusions stay within what the evidence supports.
The pack presents the financial story, recommendation and source trail for executive or board review. A reader should be able to question the reasoning as well as the result.
Valuation and earnings analysis require judgement. I make the assumptions visible rather than allow them to look like source facts.
Reviewer authority covers the conclusions and assumptions. Additional questions can require further analysis before a recommendation is relied on.
The factory separates the data contract, presentation instructions and renderer, then checks the output before export.
This is a related reporting capability, not the original generator of the selected acquisition report. A historical pack demonstrated the approach; the wider reusable factory remains under development.
The full view includes search, connected paths, presentation mode and export tools.
Choose a part to see its purpose, its connections and supporting detail.
The reporting contract gives the renderer checked data in a known structure. Acquisition analysis and judgement remain outside the factory.
The view specification describes how the report presents the checked data, including its sections, visuals and caveats. It is separate from the figures.
The renderer turns the contract and view specification into HTML. Its job is presentation rather than inventing financial figures or acquisition conclusions.
The historical pack used control-total, freshness, offline-rendering and reader-comprehension checks. Those recorded checks do not certify every later factory capability.
A checked report can be delivered in the supported offline formats. The historical output is evidence of that pack; the wider factory still has development work.
A pack with unresolved validation or interpretation problems needs correction. The factory does not convert an unsupported source or conclusion into accepted evidence.
I assess business value, sustainable earnings and financial risks, then prepare a recommendation and the questions leadership still needs to resolve. The analysis can support integration planning; it does not make the acquisition decision.
Source-linked figures, stated assumptions and transaction-specific judgement support the valuation and quality-of-earnings analysis. AI assists initial document review and extraction; figures and conclusions remain subject to checks and reviewer authority.
A related HTML pack factory separates checked data, the view specification and rendering, with validation before export. A historical pack established the approach; the wider reusable factory remains under development. It is a separate capability from the selected acquisition report and is not claimed as that report's original generator.
Assesses business value, the sustainability of earnings and financial risks, with analysis the board can trace to its sources.
Counterparties withheld by design
Valuation
Board-ready valuation packs · live transactions
2026
Quality of earnings
Assessing sustainable earnings · live transactions
2026
Financial risks
Assessing deal risks · live transactions
2026
Due diligence questions
Follow-up analysis of data-room documents · live transactions
2026
Helps decision-makers compare opportunities sooner and check the analysis behind each recommendation.
Structured outputs for consistent review and board-ready decisions across deals.
Used AI for an initial review of documents and data extraction, while keeping every figure linked to its source and available for checking.
Live group transactions, analysed using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).