Skip to content

Assessing acquisition opportunities (M&A)

M&A, audit & deal work Capability project

I turn financial records and deal questions into analysis leaders can challenge, with assumptions and source links kept visible.

  1. The problem

    A potential acquisition needs more than a headline valuation. Leaders need to understand sustainable earnings, financial risks and the evidence behind the assumptions.

  2. My role

    I build the financial analysis and prepare the decision pack. It connects valuation, sustainable earnings, currency translation and financial risks to their supporting evidence.

  3. Where it stands

    Used the approach in live transaction work. One engagement led to an acquisition recommendation and integration plan. No completed transaction outcome is disclosed.

See the approach in a fictional report

An invented business and figures illustrate how a decision report can work. This demonstration is not evidence of a delivered deal or a real transaction outcome.

Explore a fictional acquisition review

From evidence to a decision.

Follow the financial investigation, trace the reasoning, then explore the related reporting factory.

How does a deal question become a decision pack?

A clear question sets the scope. Source review and financial analysis lead to a recommendation that leadership can challenge.

Explore the full process (new tab)

This is the public method, not a record of a disclosed transaction. Preparing a recommendation does not establish that a deal closed.

The full view includes search, connected paths, presentation mode and export tools.

Read the map in plain English

Choose a part to see its purpose, its connections and supporting detail.

Set the question and investigate

Set the decision questionWhat needs to be decided?

I frame the valuation, earnings and financial-risk questions the analysis needs to answer. The scope depends on the opportunity.

Read the supporting detail
Review the evidenceDocuments and follow-up questions

I review the available financial records and use initial AI-assisted document extraction where useful. Source links make the extracted figures available for checking.

Read the supporting detail
Analyse the businessEarnings, value and risk

I assess sustainable earnings, valuation assumptions and financial risks. Transaction-specific judgement remains visible within a consistent method.

Read the supporting detail

Prepare and review the recommendation

Prepare the recommendationReasons and open questions

I bring the analysis together in a decision pack, stating the recommendation, its assumptions and what still needs to be resolved.

Read the supporting detail
Leadership reviewsChallenge the assumptions

Leadership can question the evidence and assumptions behind the recommendation. The acquisition decision remains with leadership.

Read the supporting detail
Plan what followsIntegration considerations

The analysis can inform an integration plan and further diligence. A plan is distinct from a completed acquisition or an executed integration.

Read the supporting detail

Resolve what remains uncertain

Resolve open questionsEvidence or judgement still needed

Unresolved questions return to investigation. The pack should make the uncertainty visible rather than present an unsupported conclusion.

Read the supporting detail

Can a reader trace a conclusion back to its basis?

Figures, assumptions and judgement travel through different checks before they meet in the decision pack.

Explore the full process (new tab)

The view explains the method. It contains no private figures, transaction assumptions or client records; a scenario remains an assumption, not an observed result.

The full view includes search, connected paths, presentation mode and export tools.

Read the map in plain English

Choose a part to see its purpose, its connections and supporting detail.

Financial evidence

Financial recordsOriginal supporting material

Financial statements and supporting deal records provide the basis for the analysis. I preserve source links so a reviewer can inspect where a figure came from.

Read the supporting detail
Checked figuresSource-linked and reviewable

Extracted figures remain subject to deterministic checks. An AI extraction is an initial aid, not an independently accepted financial fact.

Read the supporting detail
Earnings and valuationConsistent analytical method

The checked figures support quality-of-earnings and valuation work, including currency translation where relevant. The analysis keeps transaction-specific treatment explicit.

Read the supporting detail
Findings and caveatsWhat the analysis supports

I distinguish findings supported by the records from assumptions and unresolved questions. Conclusions stay within what the evidence supports.

Read the supporting detail
Decision packA conclusion that can be challenged

The pack presents the financial story, recommendation and source trail for executive or board review. A reader should be able to question the reasoning as well as the result.

Read the supporting detail

Assumptions and review

Stated assumptionsTransaction-specific judgement

Valuation and earnings analysis require judgement. I make the assumptions visible rather than allow them to look like source facts.

Read the supporting detail
Reviewer challengeAccept, question or request more

Reviewer authority covers the conclusions and assumptions. Additional questions can require further analysis before a recommendation is relied on.

Read the supporting detail

How can checked content become a repeatable report?

The factory separates the data contract, presentation instructions and renderer, then checks the output before export.

Explore the full process (new tab)

This is a related reporting capability, not the original generator of the selected acquisition report. A historical pack demonstrated the approach; the wider reusable factory remains under development.

The full view includes search, connected paths, presentation mode and export tools.

Read the map in plain English

Choose a part to see its purpose, its connections and supporting detail.

Define the report inputs

Checked data contractData with a defined shape

The reporting contract gives the renderer checked data in a known structure. Acquisition analysis and judgement remain outside the factory.

Read the supporting detail
View specificationSections, order and caveats

The view specification describes how the report presents the checked data, including its sections, visuals and caveats. It is separate from the figures.

Read the supporting detail

Render, check and export

Render the reportArrange approved content

The renderer turns the contract and view specification into HTML. Its job is presentation rather than inventing financial figures or acquisition conclusions.

Read the supporting detail
Check the outputReconciliation and readability

The historical pack used control-total, freshness, offline-rendering and reader-comprehension checks. Those recorded checks do not certify every later factory capability.

Read the supporting detail
Export the packHTML and offline report

A checked report can be delivered in the supported offline formats. The historical output is evidence of that pack; the wider factory still has development work.

Read the supporting detail

Review output problems

Resolve output issuesCorrect before relying on it

A pack with unresolved validation or interpretation problems needs correction. The factory does not convert an unsupported source or conclusion into accepted evidence.

Read the supporting detail
Explore the detail: my role, approach and source notes

What the work involves

Answer the decision questions

I assess business value, sustainable earnings and financial risks, then prepare a recommendation and the questions leadership still needs to resolve. The analysis can support integration planning; it does not make the acquisition decision.

Keep the reasoning checkable

Source-linked figures, stated assumptions and transaction-specific judgement support the valuation and quality-of-earnings analysis. AI assists initial document review and extraction; figures and conclusions remain subject to checks and reviewer authority.

Make the reporting method reusable

A related HTML pack factory separates checked data, the view specification and rendering, with validation before export. A historical pack established the approach; the wider reusable factory remains under development. It is a separate capability from the selected acquisition report and is not claimed as that report's original generator.

Source notes

Advises the Group CEO on live M&A decisions.

Assesses business value, the sustainability of earnings and financial risks, with analysis the board can trace to its sources.

Engagement record

Counterparties withheld by design

  • Valuation

    Board-ready valuation packs · live transactions

    2026

  • Quality of earnings

    Assessing sustainable earnings · live transactions

    2026

  • Financial risks

    Assessing deal risks · live transactions

    2026

  • Due diligence questions

    Follow-up analysis of data-room documents · live transactions

    2026

Business impact

Helps decision-makers compare opportunities sooner and check the analysis behind each recommendation.

How I did it

  1. 01

    Structured outputs for consistent review and board-ready decisions across deals.

  2. 02

    Used AI for an initial review of documents and data extraction, while keeping every figure linked to its source and available for checking.

Tools and working context

Live group transactions, analysed using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

Tools
IFRS IAS 21 · Quality-of-earnings analysis · AI-assisted workflows
Business area
M&A · Due diligence
Skill type
Finance · AI

Why I made these choices

  • Standardised the method while preserving transaction-specific judgement.
  • Kept numbers and conclusions under deterministic checks and reviewer authority.

Skills used

  • AI-assisted financial analysis AI & Automation Strong
  • IFRS / UK GAAP Finance Strong
  • M&A due diligence Finance Strong

Full skill evidence →

What I learned

  • Standardising the method improves speed without predetermining the answer.

What comes next

  • Extend the independently fictional examples and the reusable reporting method, without publishing private transaction information.

← All case studies · Discuss this work →